|
Things you can do
Stuff you may read
They say there's a book inside everybody. Let the book out with Admanya blogs. Vent your feelings about anything that pops into your head. It might be rocket science or your neighbour's cat. Start now! Its easy and fun! Blog Twitter - tweets 'not worth reading'Posted by Stranger on 07 February 2012
READ: 1285
"Twitter users say only a little more than a third of the tweets they receive are worthwhile and other tweets are either so-so or, in one out of four cases, not worth reading at all, according to a new study."
The study was conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Georgia Institute of Technology. Twitter says more than 200 million tweets are sent each day, yet most users get little feedback about the messages they send besides occasional retweets by followers, or when followers opt to stop following them. we understood what is worth reading and why, we might design better tools for presenting and filtering content, as well as help people understand the expectations of other users," said Paul Andre, a post-doctoral fellow in Carnegie Mellon's Human-Computer Interaction Institute and lead author of the study. He and his colleagues Michael Bernstein and Kurt Luther, doctoral students at MIT and Georgia Tech, respectively created a website, "Who Gives a Tweet?" to collect reader evaluations of tweets. People who visited the "Who Gives a Tweet" site were promised feedback on their tweets if they agreed to anonymously rate tweets by Twitter users they already were following. Over a period of 19 days in late 2010 and early 2011, 1,443 visitors to the site rated 43,738 tweets from the accounts of 21,014 Twitter users they followed. Overall, the readers liked just 36 percent of the tweets and disliked 25 percent. Another 39 percent elicited no strong opinion. "A well received tweet is not all that common. A significant amount of content is considered not worth reading, for a variety of reasons," Bernstein said. Despite the social nature of Twitter, tweets that were part of someone else's conversation, or updates around current mood or activity were the most strongly disliked. On the other hand, tweets that included questions to followers, information sharing and self-promotion (such as links to content the writer had created) were more often liked. The researchers acknowledge, however, that the study participants were not fully representative of Twitter users. Most were referred to the study by technology-focused friends and websites and could be categorized as "informers," who value sharing links and content. Other studies have suggested a schism among users, with others favoring the social "me" aspects of social media. "Our research is just a first step at understanding value on Twitter. Other groups within Twitter may value different types of tweets for entirely different reasons," Luther said. The findings will be presented on Feb. 13 at the Association for Computing Machinery's Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Seattle. Source midday
About this Blogger
Subscribe to Stranger's blogs You can stay up to date with Stranger's blogs via these feeds.
Latest Blogs by Stranger
Indian-American teen invents device that can charge phone in 20 seconds Ford apologises over 'distasteful, offensive scantily clad women' India car ad Sanjay Dutt: Bollywood actor sent back to jail for 1993 Mumbai blasts
Hot Blogs by Stranger
Indian politicians wearing bangles, says Thackeray Deepika Padukone and Siddharth Mallya kissing at an IPL game
Latest Blog posts
Indian-American teen invents device that can charge phone in 20 seconds India should send Commandos in Pakistan to kill Dawood Ibrahim and Anees Ibrahim Many Variety of Air Conditioners in Indian Market Eight Reasons Why Your Loan Request Can Be Turned Down Is Mukesh Ambani, the richest Indian going to pay for his "Z" category security? |

"Twitter users say only a little more than a third of the tweets they receive are worthwhile and other tweets are either so-so or, in one out of four cases, not worth reading at all, according to a new study."

